"Indefinite Leave" Declared a Reasonable Accomodation
New York's highest court has ruled this month in Romanello v. Intesa San Paolo, S.p.a. that under the New York City Human Rights Law, an indefinite leave of absence for a disability is not in and of itself an unreasonable accommodation. Instead, says the court, it is up to the employer to prove that such an accommodation would be an undue hardship.
This new ruling stands in stark contrast to the New York State and federal disability discrimination statutes. The courts interpreting those statutes have consistently held that an indefinite leave of absence as the result of a disability is not a reasonable accommodation.
The Court's ruling is significant to employers who must now meet an additional pleading requirement, that is, that the indefinite leave will result in an undue hardship, to satisfy their burden under the New York City law.
This new ruling stands in stark contrast to the New York State and federal disability discrimination statutes. The courts interpreting those statutes have consistently held that an indefinite leave of absence as the result of a disability is not a reasonable accommodation.
The Court's ruling is significant to employers who must now meet an additional pleading requirement, that is, that the indefinite leave will result in an undue hardship, to satisfy their burden under the New York City law.
